In the wake of the 2017 hurricanes, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) is providing emergency assistance to dairy operators in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. USDA is preparing for signup to begin Oct. 21, 2017.

Southern Region IPM News posts a collection of headlines from news sources throughout the Southern Region. Some of the news provided here may also be national, such as notices about upcoming EPA or NIFA webinars or national events that affect this region.

In the 10/18/2017 edition:

• APHIS Seeks Comments on Draft Pest Risk Assessments for Mamey Sapote and Sapodilla from Mexico
• Fall Pest Management Seminar in Dallas
• AgriLife Research project to examine, educate on organic wheat systems
• Upcoming Environmental Modeling Public Meeting on Assessing Exposure and Risk to Pollinators & Plants

EPA has reached an agreement with Monsanto, BASF and DuPont on measures to further minimize the potential for drift to damage neighboring crops from the use of dicamba formulations used to control weeds in genetically modified cotton and soybeans. New requirements for the use of dicamba “over the top” (application to growing plants) will allow farmers to make informed choices for seed purchases for the 2018 growing season.

“Today’s actions are the result of intensive, collaborative efforts, working side by side with the states and university scientists from across the nation who have first-hand knowledge of the problem and workable solutions,” said EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt. “Our collective efforts with our state partners ensure we are relying on the best, on-the-ground, information.”

In a series of discussions, EPA worked cooperatively with states, land-grant universities, and the pesticide manufacturers to examine the underlying causes of recent crop damage in the farm belt and southeast. EPA carefully reviewed the available information and developed tangible changes to be implemented during the 2018 growing season. This is an example of cooperative federalism that leads to workable national-level solutions.

Manufacturers have voluntarily agreed to label changes that impose additional requirements for “over the top” use of these products next year including:
• Classifying products as “restricted use,” permitting only certified applicators with special training, and those under their supervision, to apply them; dicamba-specific training for all certified applicators to reinforce proper use;
• Requiring farmers to maintain specific records regarding the use of these products to improve compliance with label restrictions;
• Limiting applications to when maximum wind speeds are below 10 mph (from 15 mph) to reduce potential spray drift;
• Reducing the times during the day when applications can occur;
• Including tank clean-out language to prevent cross contamination; and
• Enhancing susceptible crop language and record keeping with sensitive crop registries to increase awareness of risk to especially sensitive crops nearby.
Manufacturers have agreed to a process to get the revised labels into the hands of farmers in time for the 2018 use season. EPA will monitor the success of these changes to help inform our decision whether to allow the continued “over the top” use of dicamba beyond the 2018 growing season. When EPA registered these products, it set the registrations to expire in 2 years to allow EPA to change the registration, if necessary.

For more information: https://www.epa.gov/ingredients-used-pesticide-products/registration-dicamba-use-genetically-engineered-crops

The idea that the National Corn Growers Association would fall in line with the Environmental Defense Fund views seems far-fetched. However, when it comes to soil health, Chris Novak says the two organizations have a common purpose.

Novak, CEO of the National Corn Growers Association, says the time has come for farmers and ranchers to have open dialogues with environmental advocates regarding climate change, soil health and sustainability. “We can fight things out in the courts, we can fight things out in Congress — or we can buckle down, sit down at the table together and talk together about the opportunity for voluntary solution, and we can make real progress for our land and farms at the same time,” he says.

Suzy Friedman, senior director of agricultural sustainability for EDF, says that it has been a tough year for agriculture in the environmental arena. “From negative water quality reports that have pointed the finger at agriculture to the largest hypoxic zone in the Gulf of Mexico on record,” she says, “it makes it more important that we talk about finding ways that collaboration can move the ball forward on solving environmental challenges and having a vibrant agriculture sector.”

So the two organizations forged an unlikely partnership in the areas of soil health, conservation and public perception.

Digging deep
More than three years ago, the NCGA created the Soil Health Partnership. The partnership, a farmer-led initiative, looks at farm management practices that enhance sustainability and farm profitability. It is made up of working farmers from 10 states.

Companies like Monsanto and General Mills were onboard, along with the Walton Family Foundation, the Midwest Row Crop Collaborative and the USDA. However, Novak says his group knew it needed advisers in the environmental community weighing in on the how these practices impact the environment. He reached out to EDF and The Nature Conservancy.

What Novak found was that “when you take the time to sit at the table together, when you can find common purpose, common goal, common interest and get to know people, then you find win-win solutions.”

Both Novak and Friedman want those changes to be voluntary, starting at the farmer level.

Making conservation choices
For Novak, farmers working toward sustainability hits home. He grew up on a small 120-acre farm in eastern Iowa, where his dad ran cattle, raised hogs and planted alfalfa, oats, hay, corn and soybeans.

“As I think about voluntary conservation efforts, I think about my dad and the farm I grew up on,” he says.

Novak noted that at some juncture, cattle left the farm. When the cattle left, there was no need for alfalfa, so it, too, exited the operation. The hogs stayed until Novak attended college — when access to hog processing plants became limited, and the family left the hog industry.

“His choices were driven by his reality — his economic reality and the environment around him,” Novak says.

His father migrated to the typical corn and soybean rotation, but that also posed some problems.

The piece of land was hilly, and keeping the nutrients and water on the crop became a problem. “So once again, my father adapted to change,” he recalls. His father went to the local Soil and Water Conservation Service to help him draw up new grass waterways, and he put tile into the field to manage the water runoff. “He made the investment in land, conservation and stewardship — not because he had to, but because he knew it was the right thing to do,” Novak adds.

Go to Delta Farm Press for the rest of the story.